|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈啸风,柳硕岩,王枫,等.空肠营养管在食管癌三野手术围手术期中的应用及其对营养状态改善的研究[J].慢性病学杂志,2018,(12):1632-1635.
 CHEN Xiao-feng,LIU Shuo-yan,WANG Feng,et al.Application of jejunal nutrition tube in perioperative period of three-field surgery for esophageal cancer and its improvement on nutritional status[J].,2018,(12):1632-1635.
点击复制

空肠营养管在食管癌三野手术围手术期中的应用及其对营养状态改善的研究(PDF)

《慢性病学杂志》[ISSN:1674-8166/CN:11-5900/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年12期
页码:
1632-1635
栏目:
论 著
出版日期:
2018-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of jejunal nutrition tube in perioperative period of three-field surgery for esophageal cancer and its improvement on nutritional status
作者:
陈啸风 柳硕岩 王枫 陈鹏
福建省肿瘤生物治疗重点实验室,福州350014
Author(s):
CHEN Xiao-feng LIU Shuo-yan WANG Feng CHEN Peng
Fujian Key Laboratory of Cancer Biotherapy, Fuzhou 350014, China Corresponding author: CHEN Xiao-feng, E-mail: cxfeng0990@163.com
关键词:
食管癌食管癌三野根治术空肠营养管白蛋白前白蛋白
Keywords:
Esophageal cancer Esophageal cancer three-field radical surgery Jejunal nutrition tube Albumin Prealbumin
分类号:
R735.1
DOI:
-
摘要:
目的探讨空肠营养管在食管癌三野手术中的应用,及对术后患者营养状况的改善作用,为临床治疗提 供参考。方法采用回顾性横断面研究方法,收集2010 年1 月至2018 年1 月在福建省肿瘤医院胸外科完成食管 癌手术的568例患者的临床资料,均完成食管癌三野根治术。术中完成空肠造口术,并在术后4 周内完全经空肠营 养管进行肠内营养317例(管饲组);术中未完成空肠造口术,在术后第7天起开始经口进食251例(口服组)。分析 并比较两组患者临床资料;术后第4周复查,检测并比较两组患者白蛋白和前白蛋白指标水平。结果两组手术 方式差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。管饲组平均年龄为(61.79±9.24) 岁,与口服组的(60.46±8.98) 岁比较, 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者性别、病理类型、肿瘤位置、分化程度、TNM 分期比较,差异均无统 计学意义(P>0.05)。术后第4 周,管饲组白蛋白和前白蛋白水平均明显高于口服组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论术中留置经皮空肠营养管、术后通过空肠营养管进行肠内营养对于食管癌术后患者营养状况的改 善具有重要的作用。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the application of jejunal nutrition tube in the three-field operation of esophageal cancer, and to improve the nutritional status of postoperative patients and provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods A retrospective cross- sectional study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 568 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2010 to January 2018, and completed the three- field radical surgery for esophageal cancer. Intraoperative jejunostomy was performed, and 317 cases of enteral nutrition were completely administered through the jejunal nutrition tube within 4 weeks after operation (tube feeding group) . The jejunostomy was not completed during the operation, and the import began on the 7th day after surgery in 251 cases (oral group) . The clinical data of the two groups were analyzed and compared. The levels of albumin and prealbumin were measured and compared in the 4th week after surgery. Results There was no significant difference in the surgical methods between the two groups (P>0.05) . The average age of the tube- fed group was (61.79 ± 9.24) years old andwas (60.46±8.98) years in the oral group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05) . There were no significant differences in gender, pathological type, tumor location, differentiation degree and TNM staging between the two groups (P>0.05) . At the 4th week af-ter operation, the albumin and prealbumin levels in the tube- fed group were significantly higher than those in the oral group (P<0.05) . Conclusion Intraoperative percutaneous jejunal nutrition tube and postoperative enteral nutrition through jejunal nutrition tube play an important role in improving the nutritional status of postoperative patients with esophageal cancer.

参考文献/References:


[1] 全国肿瘤防治研究办公室,卫生部卫生统计信息中心. 中国恶性 肿瘤危险因素研究[M]. 北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2003: 235-236.
[2] 柳硕岩,王枫,郑庆丰,等. 腔镜食管癌根治术在食管癌治疗中的 临床应用.中华胃肠外科杂志[J],2012,15(9):947-949.
[3] Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta- analysis [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001,72(1):306- 313.
[4] Biere SS, Henegouwen MIVB, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open- label, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2012,379(9829):1887-1892.
[5] Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial [J]. World J Surg, 2015,39(8):1986- 1993.
[6] Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, et al. Anastomotic leakage post- esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,27(1):3-7.
[7] 王枫,柳硕岩,王健键,等. 全腔镜食管癌三野根治术颈部机械吻 合与手工吻合的应用比较[J],2014,17(9):881-883.
[8] Singla N, Kaman L, Singh R. Anterior route reconstruction after transhiatal esophagectomyis comparable with posterior route reconstruction [J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2007, 26(3):143-145.
[9] Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, et al. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010,37(4):807-813.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介:陈啸风,研究生,主治医师,研究方向:胸外科、营养学
通信作者:陈啸风,E-mail:cxfeng0990@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-30