|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吕鸥,张美云,孙晓冰,等.北京朝阳区公共场所空气中甲醛污染状况监测分析[J].慢性病学杂志,2017,(01):5-7.
　LV Ou,ZHANG Mei-yun,SUN Xiao-bing,et al.Status analysis of formaldehyde of public indoor air in public places in Chaoyang District, Bejing[J].,2017,(01):5-7.
点击复制

北京朝阳区公共场所空气中甲醛污染状况监测分析(PDF)

《慢性病学杂志》[ISSN:1674-8166/CN:11-5900/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
5-7
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2017-02-16

文章信息/Info

Title:
Status analysis of formaldehyde of public indoor air in public places in Chaoyang District, Bejing
作者:
吕鸥; 张美云; 孙晓冰; 张德彪
北京市朝阳区疾病预防控制中心环境卫生科，北京100021
Author(s):
LV Ou;  ZHANG Mei-yun;  SUN Xiao-bing;  ZHANG De-biao
Beijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China Corresponding author: SUN Xiao-bing, E-mail: cycdc2@126.com
关键词:
公共场所; 甲醛; 室内空气
Keywords:
Public places;  Formaldehyde;  Indoor air
分类号:
R12
DOI:
-
摘要:
目的了解北京市朝阳区公共场所室内空气中甲醛的污染状况。方法2012 年1 月—2014 年12 月北京 市朝阳区疾病预防控制中心对五大类公共场所包括旅店、商场和书店、图书馆和博物馆、体育馆和文化娱乐场所 进行空气甲醛质量监测。室内空气甲醛监测按照《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》（GB/T 17220-1998） 执行，样 本的检验按照《公共场所卫生标准检验方法》（GB/T 18204-2000） 进行。检验结果依据《公共场所卫生标准》 进行判定。结果2012—2014 年度，三年共监测公共场所空气甲醛3 383 件，其中合格3 050 件，总合格率为 90.16%。新开业的公共场所空气甲醛指标的监测合格率较低，三年分别为86.79%、76.75%和93.37%；而已营业 的公共场所空气甲醛指标的监测合格率可高达94.96%、87.64%和96.00%，与新开业的公共场所的空气甲醛比较 有统计学差异（P<0.05）。2013年度商场、书店的空气甲醛指标监测合格率最低为69.67%，而其他类公共场所空 气甲醛指标监测合格率均在75.00%以上。结论公共场所室内空气质量卫生监管工作仍需加强。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the status of formaldehyde of public indoor air in public places in Chaoyang District, Beijing. Methods From Jan. 2012 to Dec. 2014, formaldehyde of public place including hotels, shopping centers and bookstores, libraries and museums, gymnasiums and cultural venues in Chaoyang District were monitored by Beijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention. According to “Technical rules of health monitoring for public places” (GB/T 17220- 1998) and “Standard examination methods for public places” (GB/T 18204- 2000), the concentrations of formaldehyde in indoor air of the public places were examined. The test results depend on hygienic standard for public place. Results A total of 3 383 samples were examined in 2012-2014, and 3 050 samples were passed the standard with qualified rate of 90.16% . The qualified rate of the new- opened public places in 2012- 2014 was 86.79% , 76.75% and 93.37% , respectively; while the qualified rate of opened public places in 2012-2014 was 94.96%, 87.64% and 96.00%, respectively. The qualified rate of shopping centers, bookstores in 2013 was lowest with 69.67% . The qualified rates of other public places were above 75.00% . Conclusion Supervision and management of indoor air quality in public places should be strengthened.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nielsen GD, Wolkoff P. Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value [J]. Arch Toxicol, 2010,84(6):423-446.
[2] 杨振洲,蔡同建.室内甲醛的危害及预防[J].中国公共卫生,2003, 19(6):765-768.
[3] 熊文艳,邱荣发,钟淙,等. 南昌市公共场所空气中甲醛污染对从 业人员的健康风险评价[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(1):14-16.
[4] Harada K, Hara K, Wei C N, et al. Case study of volatile organic compounds in indoor air of a house before and after repair where sick building syndrome occurred [J]. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 2007,20(Suppl 2):69-74.
[5] Guo H, Kwok NH, Cheng HR, et al. Formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong Homes: concentrations and impact factors [J]. Indoor air, 2009,19(3):206- 217.
[6] 董倩,梅军,张秋玲. 装修后居室空气中甲醛污染调查[J]. 中国卫 生监督杂志,2002,9(5):286.
[7] 刘晓峰. 装修后居室空气中甲醛浓度变化的监测分析[J]. 公共卫 生与预防医学,2009,20(2):92-93.
[8] 王耀晖.公共场所室内甲醛污染现状与研究进展[J].职业与健康, 2015,31(1):128-130.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：吕鸥，大学本科，副主任医师，从事环境流行 病学工作。 通信作者：孙晓冰，E-mail: cycdc2@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-24